Showing posts with label M16. Show all posts
Showing posts with label M16. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Diane Inquest: British News Blackout continues

Earlier transcripts, from a news blackout by the British media, of censored information, deemed by the authorities, as not appropriate for British commoners.

>


http://www.scottbaker-inquests.gov.uk/hearing_transcripts/030308am.htm





Diane Inquest, Secret Service questions remain unanswered ???. The usual censorship of the press continued in Britain on the Diane inquest. Commoners in Britain suffered another day of a news blackout, of startling new revelations at the inquest, into the cause of her death and questions that remain, regarding the involvement of British secret services.

Mr. Darren Lyons had told police, he was convinced that British secret service agents had raided his office in London, searched and/or planted audio and video surveillance devices there.

Mr Lyons was cross-examined on the dark subject of secret service involvement, by Mr. Nicholas Hilliard QC.

Hilliard: Right. The next incident I want to ask you about, please, Mr Lyons, is the early hours of 5th September 1997. So we are moving on three days or so from the Tuesday, all right?
Lyons: Yes, sir, yes.
Hilliard: We have - and again perhaps we will hear about this later - a police computer print-out that deals with a call, I think at 00.52, so 8 minutes to 1 in the morning of 5th September 1997.
Lyons: That is correct, sir.
Hilliard: When the police were called and came to the premises.
Lyons: Yes, sir.
Hilliard: Now, I think you had gone out, is this right, to dinner with staff that evening?
Lyons: That is right, sir.
Hilliard: Can you help us, please, with what happened when you came back to the offices?
Lyons: Yes, sir. As we came back, I noticed, walking back towards the office, that the whole of Clerkenwell Road was lit up, except for my office, which I found obviously strange, and there was not a light on in the building. As I approached over to the building, I unlocked the door, the alarm was not on, there was no power to the building. As I entered, I saw a faint light or something behind it with a - to describe it to you, sir, there was a wall between the front and back office computer room that was all bricked glass, so it was diffused. I walked in and saw this, found it odd and - it seemed like some kind of a flashlight or - there was certainly a fuzzy light and then I heard a ticking noise. Now, obviously, as you can imagine at the time, with what was going on around us, the first thing that registered in my brain was a degree of panic as I felt that this could be - came from the earlier threat that had been made to our offices and other threats throughout this particular time. I immediately ran from the office and dialled the emergency services and several police cars arrived within four to five minutes, I think. I cannot be specific on the time, but pretty much immediately. The police offers told me, when they arrived, not to panic, entered the building, and they could find at the time, sir, no visible force of entry into my premises. From what I have said before, nothing seemed to have been stolen, so ...
Hilliard: Right, but if we take it bit by bit, they found nobody on the premises, is that right?
Lyons: That is correct, sir.
Hilliard: Although you heard the ticking sound and no doubt because of what somebody had said in the phone call earlier in the week, they were going to blow the building up, you were concerned about that, but no ticking bomb was found, is this right, in the premises?
Lyons: No, it was not, sir, indeed, but you can understand the worry at the time with that kind of sound.
Hilliard: I quite understand because, as I say, of the call that you had had earlier in the week.
Lyons: Indeed.
Hilliard: In the police computer print-out for that night, at 18 minutes past 1 in the morning, there is an entry that says that the ticking sound was clocks ticking in the newsroom.
Lyons: If that is what the police statement says, that could well be the case, sir. There certainly were several clocks up on the newsroom wall, behind quite a solid glass panel, from all our country destinations and offices round the world, whether it be Sydney, Los Angeles, New York, London and Tokyo.
Hilliard: The light that you had seen, the kind of flashlight, did that transpire to have come from a computer screen that was still on?
Lyons: The police - that is exactly what the policeman said to me. The strange thing was that the power was completely cut out.
Hilliard: Right. Just one other part of this topic.
Lyons: Yes, sir.
Hilliard: You have expressed, I think, in the past, the opinion that the security services were in your offices that night.
Lyons: Sir, I think that comes from a situation where certainly there had been - on the street and talk between the photographers at the time, there had been another break-in to another French gentleman, I think it was Lionel Cherrault's home or office.
Hilliard: We heard all about that yesterday.
Lyons: Okay.
Hilliard: So we know what what you are talking about.
Lyons: Okay. I think that - the talk that came back to my office at the time was that people had been saying that the security services broke into his situation and stole computers. I think the assessment at that stage, sir, was made on why would two picture agencies have people break in at the same time. So it was another situation of - I suppose one would say "assumption". I have no evidence of who was in my office that particular night at all. I got out of there as quickly as I could.
Hilliard: I suppose we have to add if anyone was actually in your office that night.
Lyons: Point taken, sir, yes.
Hilliard: In due course, did you make a statement - I asked you about this earlier - to somebody who was acting on behalf of Mohamed Al Fayed? Did you talk about the events that you have been telling us about?
Lyons: Yes, I did. I recall - I think it was a Mr Macnamara at the time.
Hilliard: How did that contact come about? What was the first contact?
Lyons: It was a telephone conversation. He phoned me and was extremely polite and asked me could he come - I cannot remember the time or date this took place or the time after the incident, but he asked if he could come down and meet me privately to discuss the situation. Mr Fayed had felt that my thoughts on the subject of what happened and those particular nights surrounding that time would be helpful, and also to get some photographs of the last days of his son that were taken with the Princess of Wales in the South of France, which I packaged up and sent over to his office as a gift.
Hilliard: So, what, there had been some initial contact after which you had sent some photographs?
Lyons: That is correct, sir, and then a meeting was arranged. Mr Macnamara came over and met me in a bar in Clerkenwell, a bar called "1920". We sat down and had a frank discussion. I think he asked me would I make a statement and of course - I said of course I would. In these circumstances, I would be willing to help Mr Fayed in every way I could.
Hilliard: Were you paid any money for the photographs that you had provided?
Lyons: No, sir, I was not. I was offered, for my time and expenses, an envelope, which I refused to take, but thanked him anyway.
Hilliard: Did you know what was in the envelope?
Lyons: No. I assumed it was money because I was told at the time, "Mr Fayed would like you to have this for your time and expenses", sir.
Hilliard: In any event, you had provided, is this right, photographs of them on the holiday in the South of France by this time? You had already provided those?
Lyons: That is right, as a gift. Yes, sir, I sent them over because they were wonderful pictures of the two of them together and I felt that it was a nice thing to do in the circumstances, and he was very - I also received a call back from Mr Macnamara after that, that Mr Fayed was extremely appreciative of this.

Mr. Lyons has maintained over the last ten years that secret service agents raided his office. The puzzling thing about the incident is that on a very busy London street, this was the only office that suffered a power cut and no other building was affected.

Questions remain unanswered: Who broke into the Big Pictures office and what were they after ? What about the the raid on Mr. Cherrault's office at the same time ???

Thursday, February 21, 2008

BRITISH CENSORSHIP



Prince Philip

Under questioning Mr. al-Fayed reiterated that he was in "no doubt" that Diana and Dodi were murdered by UK security services on the order of Prince Philip.

He declared: "It´s well known he is a racist. He´ll not accept my son as a person who is different religion, naturally tanned, curly hair. They´ll not accept he´ll have anything to do with the future king." He did not think that the Queen was involved.

But he added: "Prince Philip is the actual head of the Royal Family. He was brought
up by his auntie who married Hitler´s general. Would someone growing up with Nazis accept my son? No way. Time to send him back to Germany or where he comes from."

Then he continued: ""You want his original name? It ends with >Frankenstein<."

Prince Charles

Insisting Charles wanted Diana out of the way so he could marry Camilla, Mr. al Fayed said: "He knows what is going to happen because he´d like to marry his Camilla."

Then he added: "They cleared the decks, they finished her, they murdered her. And now he is happy. He married his crocodile wife."

The Princess

When the questioning moved on Mr. al Fayed claimed that Diana told him before and during the holiday they shared in July 1997 of her fears for her safety. He said: "She told me she knew Prince Philip and Prince Charles were trying to get rid of her."

He also asserted: "She suffered for twenty years this Dracula family."CENSORED
Diana coroner in contempt warning

7 hours ago
The inquest on Thursday was hearing evidence from the widow and son of a paparazzi photographer, James Andanson.

He had taken pictures of the princess before the crash that killed her and Fayed in Paris.

Andanson was found dead in a burnt-out car in 2000.

The inquest continues.

CENSORED


The coroner in charge of the inquest into the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and her lover Dodi Fayed has issued a warning to anyone commenting on the value of the hearing.

International interest and demands for the hearing to be shut down spiked this week with evidence from Mohamed al Fayed and former MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove.

Lord Justice Scott Baker told the central London court: "These inquests which are an inquiry into two deaths and are being heard by a jury ... They will continue to be heard by a jury on evidence they hear in this court and nothing else. Comments made outside this court, often about a limited aspect of the evidence, may tender the maker or publisher liable to contempt of court."

He went on: "I again urge great care that nothing is said, written or published that may influence the jury."

Michael Mansfield QC, for Mohamed al Fayed, asked the Coroner to explain the "parameters and legal necessity" for the inquests.

He also noted that it is now widely-known that Diana had fears for her safety.

The inquest has heard Diana's friends discuss her private life in detail.

Earlier this week Mr al Fayed told the jury his son was "slaughtered" by MI6 on Prince Philip's orders because she pregnant with Dodi's child and the couple were about to get engaged. Driver Henri Paul was also killed in the Paris car crash in August 1997.



Why does Mohamed Al Fayed get such stick?

Thursday, 21 February 2008

How the great and good of the British establishment must be rejoicing – discreetly sheltered by their castle walls and stucco facades. They finally granted Mohamed Al Fayed his yearned-for day in court, and now the whole Diana conspiracy has evaporated in the steam of his own overheated rhetoric. That's what we call fair play, old chaps, fair play.

But it is not fair play at all, is it? All right, so Mr Al Fayed appears to have been treated with due deference inside the court, as the bereaved father he will remain for the rest of his days. As a key witness and man of material substance, he might have hoped for gentler handling, but even the most hostile questions never went beyond the pale. Dodi's father was allowed his dignity. There is still such a thing as courtroom etiquette, and far be it from the establishment to breach it.

Outside the court, it was another matter. The media coverage was merciless. Front pages hurled invective. Yet most merely reproduced Mr Al Fayed's own colourful expressions. There was no need to embellish, still less ridicule. The owner of Harrods had done it all himself.

So much for the headlines. The accompanying reports dripped with innuendo. There was race – who was this man, it was implied, to speak of our Royal Family as "Draculas" who would never accept his son? Silent answer: an Arab with the excitability that belongs to that alien part of the world. And there was class: in all the references to the billions Al Fayed spent lurked disdain for a shopkeeper made good. Oh, and he wasn't quite dressed for the occasion; the wrong sort of check, you know. At once condescending and contemptuous, the reports let us know that this Al Fayed character, whoever he was, was definitely, positively, not "one of us".

Could such negative – no, insulting – coverage have been predicted? Of course. It was no more surprising than The Sun headline, "45 Minutes from Doom" that followed publication of the dossier stating the time within which Saddam Hussein could deploy his non-existent weapons. Once you know how the relevant sections of the popular press work, you can play them like the proverbial violin.

In giving Mohamed Al Fayed his day in court, the establishment took the most negligible of risks. Short of failing to turn up or answering in curt monosyllables, there was nothing Mr Al Fayed could do to escape the trap. Too emotional? Too un-British? Too... er, common? You almost wonder why, if it was going to be so easy to damn his credibility with his own words, he wasn't invited to the witness box a decade earlier.

Those of us who still suspect that more lies behind Diana's death than an irresponsible French driver, were dismissed as fantasists, who now had to believe what the establishment had told them. Because Al Fayed was emotional and hyperbolic, every aspect of his story was judged unworthy of consideration; he was speaking cock and bull.

Yet the one does not follow from the other. How many times do you have to say this: here is a father, bereft of his elder son. You can argue, if you like, that he has money and interests sufficient to absorb his sorrows – unlike fond fathers of lesser means. You can criticise his son's lifestyle: to put no finer point on it, Dodi was a playboy; one hopes Diana knew the life she was getting herself into. You may have views on Mohamed Al Fayed's character or his merits as a businessman.

That he may not have presented his case in the most convincing way for an audience more attuned to understatement, however, does not mean that his belief in a conspiracy is discredited. There are old questions that remain unanswered: that white Fiat Uno; the French paparazzo found later with his throat cut; the contradictory accounts of the chauffeur's drinking habits; Diana's fears that she would die in an arranged car accident; and the presence of an MI6 team in Paris on the fateful weekend.

And there are new questions that have been raised by this inquest: not least why witnesses at the scene who volunteered their accounts were not properly interviewed at the time. It is also curious that the Metropolitan Police failed to come clean about Diana's written fears for her life after she died. You might also add the claim that the secret services experimented with dazzling lights for the purpose of causing road accidents. But that came from a supposedly discredited former agent, so it can't possibly be true – can it?

As the Diana inquest lumbers on, Mohamed Al Fayed's testimony is being held up as proof that the whole exercise was ill-conceived and futile. It is a classic case of allowing the messenger to obscure the message. I wonder in whose interests that might be?

m.dejevsky

Monday, February 18, 2008

Al Fayed Details Diana's Murder

UPDATE FEB 19

Princess Diana feared the Royal Family would kill her while her sons were not present, her inquest has heard.
She told Dodi Al Fayed she would be killed in an accident, but stressed that Princes William and Harry "would never be harmed", it was said.

Dodi's US assistant, Melissa Henning, said these were Diana's thoughts just weeks before the couple died in a Paris car crash in August 1997.

The couple "deeply" believed this was a possibility, Ms Henning said.

She said she thought the claims were a "little far-fetched" at first.

'Very difficult'

Ms Henning heard Dodi's fears over a dinner in August, shortly before their deaths, she said.

Speaking via videolink from the US, she said: "He told me that Diana was very concerned for her personal safety. They had discussed this several times.

"She had felt the Royal Family did not want her around any more.

"She thought they felt she was a threat to them and they would prefer not to have her around.

"She felt it would be an accident and it would only happen when the boys were not with her because the boys would never be harmed."

Ms Henning said she was sceptical, adding: "She was such a public person that I felt it would be a very difficult thing to accomplish."

She contacted Mohamed Al Fayed about the conversation following the crash, the court heard.
Harrods owner Mohammed Al Fayed has appeared before a coroner outlining the conspiracy which he believed was hatched to kill his son Dodi and Princess Diana in August 1997.

Mr Al Fayed claimed that:

# The car crash in which Diana, Dodi and their driver, Henri Paul, were "murdered" was orchestrated by MI6 on the instructions of the Duke of Edinburgh

# Britain is not really a democracy, but is controlled from behind the scenes by Prince Philip, the Lord Chamberlain and an organisation called the Way Ahead group "who decide the destiny of this country"

# The murder was carried out at the behest of the security services by photographer James Andanson, who has since died, by using a strobe light to blind Mr Paul

# Mr Andanson was later murdered by British security services

# The then-prime minister, Tony Blair, was part of the plot

# British and French security services employees may have been part of the ambulance crew that took Diana to hospital to ensure she bled to death. A hospital which could have treated her was 10 minutes from the site of the crash, Mr Al Fayed said, but she was not taken to another medical building for an hour

# Robert Fellowes, the Princess's brother-in-law and at the time the Queen's then-private secretary, was at the British Embassy in Paris prior to the accident and took control of the building's communication centre to contact GCHQ

# Sir Michael Jay, at that time the British ambassador to France, was also involved in the conspiracy

# The CIA also took part by tapping mobile phones

# Princess Diana told Mr Al Fayed personally that "she knew Prince Philip and Prince Charles were trying to get rid of her"

# Prince Philip was a "Nazi" and a "racist", and his real name "ends with Frankenstein"

# Diana's divorce lawyer, Lord Mishcon, wrote a note in October 1995 outlining her fears that there was a plot to kill her in a car crash. Lord Mishcon passed this to police after the crash

# But it was only after the princess's ex-butler, Paul Burrell, produced a note from the princess making similar allegations in the Daily Mirror in October 2003 that the Metropolitan Police agreed to hand over the note to the inquest

# Diana and Dodi told Mr Al Fayed one hour before the crash that she was pregnant and that the couple would announce their engagement days later. Mr Burrell was also told

# Dodi told Mr Al Fayed: "I bought the ring"

# But once the security services - who were bugging their phones - learned of their plans, the decision was taken to have them assassinated

# Diana told Mr Al Fayed that she had kept a wooden box, and if anything were to happen to her the contents of the box must be made public

# Mr Burrell and Diana's sister, Lady Sarah McCorquodale, had promised to keep this box safe, but failed to do so

# Mr Paul was in the pay of MI6, as was Diana's close friend Rosa Monckton

# Blood supposedly taken from the body of Mr Paul in a Paris mortuary after the crash - which appeared to show the driver had been drinking - was not really his

# Professors Lecomte and Pepin at the mortuary were employed by French intelligence to switch the samples and assist the cover-up

# In addition, mortuary staff took Diana's "guts out to really completely falsify the body" and conceal that she was pregnant. She was embalmed to "corrupt the body"

# The former home secretary, Jack Straw, was acting on the orders of "dark forces" when he refused Mr Al Fayed a passport

# Bodyguard Trevor Rees - the only survivor of the Paris crash - was "turned against" Mr Al Fayed by MI6, as were his colleagues Kes Wingfield and Ben Murrell

# Mr Wingfield was lying when he said Mr Al Fayed had approved a plan to use a decoy and for Diana and Dodi to leave by the back door of the Ritz hotel in Paris

# The security services rewarded Mr Rees for his involvement in the plot with an appointment as head of security for the United Nations in East Timor

# Journalists working for the Daily Mail, the Mail on Sunday, The Telegraph and the Sunday Telegraph - acting on the instructions of MI6 - have all been engaged in a campaign to destabilise Mr Al Fayed's businesses as a punishment for speaking out against the conspiracy

# Diana's relationship with heart surgeon Hasnat Khan was "not serious". Mr Al Fayed said she would never marry someone who "lived in a council flat and has no money"

# Lord Stevens, the former Met police chief who conducted a report into the princess's death, was influenced by the establishment to conclude Diana's death was an accident

Murder of a Princess



It appears that Mr Al Fayed is an intelligent republican after all, who knows exactly how perfidious Albion, really works. All Irish republicans know that Mr Al Fayed speaks the truth,we have known this for centuries, how can the House of Orange support a German King ?





This former MI5 agent speaking in America about her experiences changes direction momentarily where she expresses her opinion that Princess Diana's death was part of a plot and no accident for her opposition to the Israeli occupation of Palestine.




She is just a puppet for the monarchy. I think that the monarchy felt threatened that palace secrets were out in the open and that frightened them. I don't know how Diana lasted as long as she did in that environment. She was doing just fine "navigating her new world" as it was so put until the monarchy silenced her forever. Took the prince's mother away from them forever.









The king ordered it it'll never come out tho anyone who gets near the truth will be mince meat...some say he rules the country from behind the scenes and the goverment are just puppets he pulls the strings ...maybe so...the queen once said..there are dark forces at work within this country...i believe it...the royals are elites these kind of people never truly give up the rains of power there powerful..and we all no what power does to peoples heads



david icke talks further, about the princess diana assassination.






david icke elaborates on the princess diana assassination








http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=3Kb9SfEbmGA